{“translated_text”: “{n “1”: “
Introduction: From Macro Theory to Practical Allocation
\r\n
The first part of this series focuses on building a high-level framework: stepping beyond the confines of cryptocurrency, understanding liquidity as the core driver, and anchoring asset behavior within macroeconomic cycles. However, such frameworks often encounter practical challenges.
\r\n
Many investors find that macro analysis sounds compelling but yields little in actual decision-making. Interest rates, inflation, and liquidity trends seem distant from day-to-day portfolio choices. This gap between theory and practice is precisely why most macro frameworks fall short.
\r\n
The latter half of this series aims to bridge this gap. The key is not to abandon macro thinking but to refine it by breaking down assets based on pricing attributes—which assets are globally priced and which are locally priced. This distinction determines how capital actually flows and why some markets outperform while others stagnate.
\r\n
\r\n
Attribute Breakdown: Why Pricing Mechanisms Matter
\r\n
After mapping the global asset landscape, the next step is to break down assets based on how they are priced. This step is crucial because capital is finite. When money flows into one market, it must flow out of another.
\r\n
On the surface, cryptocurrency appears borderless. It trades around the clock, unrestricted by national exchanges or geographic boundaries. However, the funds flowing into the cryptocurrency market are not entirely borderless. They originate from specific markets: U.S. equities, Japanese bonds, European savings, or emerging market capital.
\r\n
This presents a significant analytical challenge. While cryptocurrency prices are global, their funding sources are local. Understanding this is essential. Where the money comes from is just as important as understanding why it is moving.
\r\n
The same applies to traditional assets. Equity research must distinguish between U.S. stocks, Japanese stocks, and European stocks. Each reflects different economic structures, policy regimes, and capital behaviors. Only by making these distinctions can macro variables become actionable.
\r\n
\r\n
Why Macroeconomics Often Feels \”Useless\” in Practice
\r\n
One reason macro analysis is often dismissed is the perception that it is disconnected from practical operations. When deciding whether to buy a specific asset, inflation data and central bank speeches can seem abstract and detached.
\r\n
However, this is not because macroeconomics is irrelevant, but because its application is often too broad.
\r\n
Excess returns do not come from predicting economic growth or inflation in isolation but from understanding how changes in the macroeconomic environment affect relative returns. Reallocating marginal capital among competing assets—market movements depend not on absolute conditions but on relative attractiveness.
\r\n
When capital is scarce, it concentrates; when liquidity expands, it searches far and wide. Ignoring this process means passively waiting for market narratives rather than anticipating and leading trends.
\r\n
Studying macro trends allows investors to track the most favorable assets across different periods rather than being trapped in inactive markets waiting for conditions to improve.
\r\n
\r\n
Globally Priced Assets: One Dollar, One Market
\r\n
Some assets are globally priced. The implicit assumption behind this classification is the U.S. dollar as the world’s monetary anchor.
\r\n
Cryptocurrencies, gold, and major commodities fall into this category. Their prices reflect global supply and demand, not the conditions of any single economy. Dollars flowing in from New York or Tokyo have the same impact on global prices.
\r\n
This has significant implications: the indicators used to analyze these assets are highly overlapping. Real interest rates, dollar liquidity, global risk appetite, and monetary policy expectations tend to affect all three simultaneously.
\r\n
Due to this overlap, globally priced assets are often the most efficient targets for macro-driven asset allocation. A correct assessment of liquidity conditions can generate returns across multiple markets at once.
\r\n
This is the first layer of asset rotation efficiency: knowing when globally priced assets will collectively benefit from the same macro tailwinds.
\r\n
\r\n
Equities as Locally Priced Assets
\r\n
Equities are fundamentally different. They represent claims on the future cash flows of specific economic entities. Consequently, even in the era of global capital markets, equity prices remain regional.
\r\n
Global liquidity matters, but it is filtered through local factors that cannot be ignored. Each equity market is influenced by a unique combination of structural factors.
\r\n
The U.S. stock market is shaped by global capital inflows, technological leadership, and multinational corporate dominance. Its valuations often reflect not only domestic economic growth but also the ability of U.S. companies to capture profits globally.
\r\n
Japanese equities are highly responsive to currency dynamics, corporate governance reforms, and long-term deflation recovery. Even modest inflation or wage growth can have outsized effects on market sentiment and valuations.
\r\n
European equities are more sensitive to energy costs, fiscal constraints, and regional political coordination. Economic growth is typically slower, so the impact of policy stability and cost structures is more pronounced.
\r\n
Because of these differences, equity investing requires deeper local knowledge than investing in globally priced assets. Macro trends set the stage, but local structures determine the outcome.
\r\n
\r\n
Bonds as Jurisdictionally Priced Assets
\r\n
Bond markets are even more regional. Each sovereign bond market reflects a specific currency, fiscal capacity, and central bank credibility. Unlike equities, bonds are directly tied to a nation’s balance sheet.
\r\n
Government bonds are not just yield instruments; they are expressions of trust—in monetary policy, fiscal discipline, and institutional stability.
\r\n
This makes bond analysis particularly complex. Two countries may have similar inflation rates, but their bond market dynamics can differ sharply due to monetary regimes, debt structures, or political risks.
\r\n
In this sense, bonds are jurisdictionally priced assets. Their performance cannot be generalized across markets. Studying bonds requires understanding national balance sheets, policy credibility, and long-term demographic pressures.
\r\n
\r\n
Synthesis: Building a Practical Global Framework
\r\n
By combining the preceding steps with attribute breakdown, a functional global asset framework begins to emerge.
\r\n
First, build a panoramic asset map rather than focusing on a single market.
Second, identify macro drivers that can affect all assets simultaneously.
Third, understand where each asset stands in the cycle.
\r\n
Fourth, distinguish between global and local pricing mechanisms.
\r\n
This layered approach transforms macro analysis from abstract theory into a decision-making tool.
\r\n
\r\n
Why Cryptocurrency Remains the Best Observation Point
\r\n
Although this framework applies to all assets, cryptocurrency remains a highly instructive entry point. Precisely because it lacks cash flows and valuation anchors, cryptocurrency reacts faster and more transparently to liquidity changes.
\r\n
Recent market performance illustrates this clearly. Despite multiple U.S. rate cuts, cryptocurrency prices have often moved sideways or declined. This has puzzled many investors who assumed that easing policies would automatically drive prices higher.
\r\n
The missing piece is risk appetite. Rate cuts do not guarantee immediate liquidity expansion or that capital is willing to flow into high-volatility assets. There is a crucial distinction between available funds and funds willing to take risks.
\r\n
The driver of cryptocurrency bull markets is not \”excess\” money but money that is no longer afraid of declines. Liquidity alone is insufficient unless capital shifts from preservation to speculation.
\r\n
This also explains why predictions about \”future cryptocurrency rallies\” are often vague. The question is not whether easing will continue but when risk tolerance truly shifts.
\r\n
\r\n
The True Role of Cryptocurrency in Global Portfolios
\r\n
In traditional financial narratives, cryptocurrency is often described as \”digital gold.\” But in practice, institutional capital treats it quite differently.
\r\n
In actual asset allocation decisions, cryptocurrency is a lower priority. It is neither a core hedge nor a defensive asset. It is a late-cycle liquidity expression—more attractive than idle cash but less trusted than almost any other asset.
\r\n
Understanding this reality is not pessimistic but clarifying. It explains why cryptocurrency underperforms during cautious easing cycles and surges when confidence returns.
\r\n
\r\n
Conclusion: This Is a Framework, Not a Promise
\r\n
The second part refines the structural”}
