Monad has outgrown the “just another overfunded L1” label. The network now holds over $1 billion in DeFi value, processes millions of transactions a day, and counts Aave, Euler, and Uniswap among its protocols.
MON, though, is a different story.
The token is back above its $0.025 public-sale price, but still far below its November 2025 high. And it’s approaching the end of the one-year lockup on team and investor tokens. So the network is gaining real economic weight — just as the token gets ready for a lot more supply.
Which side grows faster will decide what happens next.
MON Has Recovered, but the Valuation Gap Remains
As of September 29, 2026, MON was trading around $0.027, giving it a circulating market capitalization of approximately $316 million. Its fully diluted valuation was closer to $2.7 billion, while the token remained roughly 45% below its record high near $0.049.
The recovery above the public-sale price matters because it puts early public buyers back around break-even. It also shows that demand has improved since MON fell as low as approximately $0.016 in February.
Still, the low unit price can be misleading. Only about 11.8 billion MON is currently circulating, compared with an initial supply of 100 billion and additional issuance through validator rewards. MON is inexpensive per token because its supply is large, not necessarily because its valuation is low.
This distinction becomes more important as the November unlock approaches.
Monad’s $1 Billion TVL Is More Than a Headline
The strongest part of the Monad case is now visible on-chain. DefiLlama data shows DeFi total value locked at approximately $1.02 billion. Stablecoins account for about $677 million, while active real-world assets stand near $422 million.
Monad decentralized exchanges generated roughly $1.14 billion in volume over seven days, an increase of almost 38%. The network also processed more than five million transactions during a recent 24-hour period.
These figures represent a meaningful improvement from July, when Monad’s TVL was closer to $770 million. Capital has continued to enter lending markets and structured yield products, with K3 Capital, Aave and Euler accounting for much of the deposited value.
The composition is important. Monad is not relying entirely on memecoin trading or temporary NFT speculation. A substantial share of its liquidity sits in lending, stablecoins, yield markets and tokenized assets. These categories are more likely to produce repeat financial activity if the ecosystem remains competitive.
But one week of strong volume does not settle the question. Monad’s stablecoin supply recently declined by approximately 6.7% over seven days, perpetual trading volume fell by more than half and the network recorded about $4.1 million in daily net outflows. TVL remains strong, while some of the more mobile capital is beginning to move.
That divergence is more informative than the headline alone. Monad has attracted liquidity; it must now prove that it can retain it.
Aave V4 Could Give Monad a More Distinctive Market
The most important recent Monad development is not another throughput benchmark. It is a proposal to deploy Aave V4 on the network with a market designed around tokenized equities.
TokenLogic submitted the proposal to Aave governance in September. The planned structure would use separate risk segments for assets such as tokenized versions of the S&P 500 ETF, Nasdaq-100 ETF, Treasury bills, Nvidia and Tesla shares. USDC and USDT0 would provide the principal borrowing liquidity.
The design attempts to solve a genuine risk problem. Tokenized stocks follow assets that trade during fixed market hours, while DeFi operates continuously. Weekend price gaps and differences in volatility make it dangerous to place every asset in the same collateral pool. Aave V4’s hub-and-spoke architecture would separate those risk profiles while allowing them to access shared stablecoin liquidity.
The proposal would also carry forward the $15 million incentive budget previously allocated to Aave’s Monad expansion.
This could give Monad a more defensible position than simply calling itself a faster EVM chain. High-speed execution is useful, but speed alone is increasingly common. A liquid market connecting stablecoins, lending and tokenized equities would be harder to replicate.
The proposal has not yet completed Aave governance and should not be treated as a finished deployment. Its significance depends on approval, launch and subsequent borrowing demand.
Millions of Transactions Do Not Necessarily Mean Millions of Users
Monad’s transaction count demonstrates that the network can handle sustained activity. It does not reveal how widely that activity is distributed.
The network recently processed approximately 5.2 million transactions in one day, but recorded around 16,300 active addresses. That works out to hundreds of transactions per active address on average.
High-frequency trading, automated routing and arbitrage are expected on a low-cost blockchain, particularly one designed for financial applications. The ratio is not automatically a warning sign. It does, however, show why transaction count should not be used as a substitute for user adoption.
A healthier long-term picture would include growth in active addresses, stablecoin holders and fee-paying applications alongside transaction volume. If activity remains concentrated among a small number of automated participants, Monad may be technically busy without building a broad economic base.
Network Growth Does Not Flow Directly to MON Holders
Monad’s network and MON’s investment case are related, but they are not identical.
MON is used to pay transaction fees and secure the network through staking. The base portion of transaction fees is burned, creating a mechanism through which greater activity can reduce supply. At the same time, validators and stakers receive newly issued MON. Official estimates place that issuance at roughly two billion tokens per year before accounting for fee burns.
Current activity is not yet large enough to make burning the dominant force. Monad recently generated approximately $14,000 in daily chain fees and $13,000 in chain revenue. Those numbers can grow, but they remain small relative to a fully diluted valuation of approximately $2.7 billion.
The official disclosure also states that MON holders do not currently receive protocol revenue and do not have direct on-chain governance rights solely through token ownership. Investors should therefore avoid treating MON as a claim on the revenue of Monad Foundation, Category Labs or applications operating on the network.
For MON to benefit meaningfully from ecosystem growth, expanding activity must increase demand for gas, staking and network security faster than token issuance and scheduled unlocks increase supply.
What Would Make the MON Recovery More Convincing?
The most constructive signal would be continued TVL growth after incentives become less important. Incentivized deposits can leave quickly when yields decline, while organic borrowing and trading activity tend to be more durable.
Stablecoin supply also needs to stabilize. Monad cannot build a large credit and tokenized-asset market if dollar liquidity repeatedly enters and exits the network. Aave V4 would become more significant if its proposed equity markets attract borrowers rather than merely collateral deposits seeking rewards.
Finally, the market must absorb November’s supply transition without losing the public-sale price. Holding above $0.025 after the unlock would show that new demand is meeting increased liquidity. Falling below the February low near $0.016 would indicate that supply has overwhelmed the network’s improving fundamentals.
Between those levels, price alone will provide an incomplete picture. Exchange deposits from newly released wallets, staking participation, stablecoin balances and spot volume will show whether holders are positioning for the long term or preparing to exit.
Monad Has Built a Network. Now MON Must Prove Its Role in It
Monad has made measurable progress. Its TVL has passed $1 billion, weekly DEX volume has exceeded $1 billion, and established DeFi protocols have committed meaningful liquidity. The proposed Aave V4 market could also turn tokenized equities into a more distinctive part of the ecosystem.
None of this cancels the token’s supply structure.
November 24 is not automatically a crash date, but it is the moment when MON’s valuation begins facing a more realistic float. If Monad continues attracting capital while released tokens move into staking or long-term holdings, the market may absorb the change. If stablecoins leave and recipients seek liquidity at the same time, the current recovery will be difficult to sustain.
Monad has already shown that its blockchain can process activity. The next test is whether that activity creates enough demand for MON itself.
Traders can monitor broader crypto market movements and explore available trading opportunities through the Tapbit official website. Existing users can access their accounts from the Tapbit login page, while new users can register with Tapbit here.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the MON price outlook for 2026?
MON’s outlook depends heavily on the November unlock and the broader crypto market. Growth in Monad’s TVL, stablecoins and lending activity supports the recovery case, but expanding supply could limit upside. Price targets should be evaluated against circulating supply and fully diluted valuation rather than the token’s low unit price.
When is the next major Monad token unlock?
The first major anniversary release begins around November 24, 2026, one year after Monad mainnet launched. Team, investor and Category Labs treasury allocations are governed by different release schedules, so they should not be described as one identical unlock.
Will 27 billion team tokens unlock at once?
No. Approximately 27 billion MON is allocated to the team in total. Official disclosures state that released team tokens will represent about 10.7% of the initial supply at the first anniversary, with the remainder scheduled over the following three years.
